Blog

Financial sustainability Charity finance policy

23 August 2017, 10:59

Could political instability create financial instability for charities?

Charities have operated for some time in the midst of economic instability. This has become the bread and butter for most organisations - the recession, cuts in government spending or ...

Post byAndrew O'Brien

Where next?

Events »

Thursday, 6 February 2020
Midlands Conference 2020 More »

News »

Thursday, 14 November 2019
A Charity Finance Manifesto To Enable Civil Society To Thrive More »

Charities have operated for some time in the midst of economic instability. This has become the bread and butter for most organisations - the recession, cuts in government spending or fundraising regulation changes. However over the past two years, we have also seen increasing political instability (the snap election and Brexit just a couple of obvious examples) has certainly created policy uncertainty for charities. But could political instability also have a financial repercussion for charities? Earlier this week, I attended a seminar led by David Hart of Northumbria University on a new report Charity Begins at Home which has tried to understand the role of national identity on the propensity to donate to local, national and international charities. The report is available for free on the Marketing Trust’s website. The report seeks to answer that age old question – do people believe that they should focus their donations on helping fellow citizens first? Or should national identity not matter?

What does the report say?

The report is interesting because it seeks to categorise people demographically but also in terms of their values. It has six clusters: educated liberals, young urban altruists, cautious pragmatists, disengaged cynics, home-first casuals and anti-EU nationalists. The report finds that there is a significant portion of the populace, perhaps around 1 in 3, are in clusters that favour “charitable ethnocentrists” (i.e. they believe that focus should be given on charitable help for British citizens and beneficiaries). Another minority, perhaps around 1 in 10 people, are in clusters that lean more towards “charitable cosmopolitanism” (i.e. they have a preference for giving to causes that help beneficiaries in other countries, with no attachment placed on nationality). Unsurprisingly, a large group stay in the middle with elements of charitable ethnocentrism and cosmopolitanism. The report also has insight into the types of causes people are likely to donate to and the methods of donating that they feel more comfortable in giving to charities.

Why does this matter?

As times change, so too do the values of individuals. Unfortunately, we don’t have longitudinal data on the work in this report, but it does feel like feelings of patriotism and nationalism have increased relative to where they were a decade or so ago. If this research is right, and these values give preferences towards certain causes (e.g. nationalists being more interested in emergency service charities or animal charities, than overseas aid) then they could have a significant impact on fundraising in the years ahead. Although these have to be put into the context of the economic situation, regulatory changes (e.g. GDPR) and general human decency (the report finds high support for international disaster relief charities, for example) – these are things that charities should not ignore. These values also have an impact on trust. For example, it seems that charitable ethnocentrists are more concerned about waste in the charity sector. While this is hardly surprising, this may help us better communicate with the public. This also has a financial impact, with those with lower trust levels likely to give less and also be less interested in regular giving, but more focused on irregular cash donations. For me, one of the most useful things is that this research could be combined with data on opinion polls and “policy surveys” which are carried out on a regular basis to help us build models the potential impact about changing values within the country on charity finances.

Investment and understanding of donors is important

Most charities regularly assess the views of their donors and potential supporters. However in the current economic conditions such understanding is even more important. As I have noted in previous blog posts – the overall pot of fundraising income is unlikely to grow significantly due to strained household finances. Charities need to be better at understanding the prospective return on their investments in fundraising, and plan accordingly. We know that giving isn’t just about money. It’s a deeply personal matter, and values shape our decisions as much as our ability to give. This research is an important contribution that could practically help charities as they plan for the future. Will the current political instability add to the financial instability in the sector? It is hard to say. But given the current state of society and politics, we should what we can to find out. « Back to all blog posts

Blog

Could political instability create financial instability for charities?

What does the report say?

Why does this matter?

Investment and understanding of donors is important

Related Content

Five takeaways from August’s Inflation Report

Economic Outlook Briefing 2019/20

Charity Property Matters Survey 2018

Economic Outlook Briefing 2018

Charities need to find nearly £4bn additional income by 2020 finds CFG

Live Blog: Autumn Budget 2017

What should charities expect from the Autumn Budget 2017?

Government no longer has the luxury of ignoring charities

Live Blog: Spring Budget 2017

IFS 2017 Green Budget – the good, the bad, and the worrying?

Three things for charities to consider in the wake of Trump victory

Saying what we want: Devolution & Voluntary Sector Summit

Tony Armstrong looks at Devolution: working with local organisations to transform public services

Devolution is our chance to advocate for the most vulnerable

How will the 'devolution revolution' be financed?

Caron asks: 'Why does the voluntary sector need a devolution summit?'

Post-Brexit Autumn Statement is first key battleground

EU Referendum: Keep watching this space…

EU Referendum: What could this mean for charities?

Hunting for the silver lining; the IFS, the economy and charities.

What did the Romans ever know about data protection?

What’s in local government’s Christmas stocking?

What do charities need to know about the Spending Review?

Tackling some myths on the Spending Review

Financial sustainability won’t be easy for the charity sector

Welfare and employment dominate the Budget: What does this mean for charities?

Budget 2015 – Missed opportunities and targeted giveaways

Vision for sector post-2015. What did the politicians have to say at the CFG Annual Conferece?

Managing in a Downturn Report Reflections....

2014, politics, and charities

What’s new for audit and accountancy?

Election result reinforces our mission and purpose

Economic Outlook Briefing December 2019

Finance Focus Nov/Dec 2019

A Charity Finance Manifesto To Enable Civil Society To Thrive

Has the Charity Commission has taken the wrong tone in its election guidance

Why does the narrative around public 'trust' makes me feel so uncomfortable?

Why safeguarding is vital for finance leaders

What does Labour’s independent schools proposal mean for charities?

A living wage needs to lead to a sensible discussion about charity funding

Time to get on an election footing

Spending Review Briefing 2019

Civil society asks of the Spending Review 2019

We must prepare for a no-deal Brexit

The lessons for Oxfam and the wider sector

Our new PM is neither a buffoon nor a jester. It's time to take him seriously.

What does the new prime minster mean for the charity sector?

The Charity Tax Commission report - does it go far enough?

BEIS Review of the Financial Reporting Council

CFG Annual Handbook 2019

Brexit crystal ball

Spring Statement 2019

If it comes down to a vote on no-deal, vote against it, says CFG

CFG responds to the Charity Commission’s consultation on the SORP-making process

Charities are ill-prepared for a no-deal Brexit and fear the worst: CFG survey

Are you prepared for a WTO Brexit?

What the recent SCOTUS judge controversy can teach us about the Charities’ SORP

10 questions to ask before borrowing

The Brexit deal is bad for charities says CFG, as it urges MPs to vote against it on Tuesday

London Charity Property Survey Findings

London Charity Property Survey Results in Summary

London Property Survey Statistical Analysis

Increasing number of charities fear property poses risks to their charitable mission

Charity Finance Group's briefing on the Autumn Budget 2018

Live Blog: Budget 2018

Labour Conference September 2018 update - Brexit and Beyond

Brexit will be bad for both charities and beneficiaries, says new report from CFG

Cost Benefit Analysis Of Brexit For Charities

Large Charities Focus

Does the Civil Society Strategy deliver for charities?

Post-Brexit immigration rules could cause skills shortage in charities

The charity work force in post-Brexit Britain

“Who moved the cheese?” The case for innovation in the UK charity sector

Finance Focus May 2018