Blog

Charity finance policy

29 September 2017, 11:57

Serious but still lacking substance – Labour Party Conference 2017

Labour Party Conference 2017 has ended and Jeremy Corbyn’s speech has laid out his belief that the party should now be seen as a government in waiting. The mood in ...

Post byAndrew O'Brien

Where next?

Events »

Wednesday, 30 September 2020
Pensions Webinar More »

News »

Wednesday, 9 September 2020
'Tax after coronavirus’ – joint charity sector response More »

Labour Party Conference 2017 has ended and Jeremy Corbyn’s speech has laid out his belief that the party should now be seen as a government in waiting. The mood in the conference was flat at times, at least for those without passes in the conference hall, but unlike previous conferences there is a sense of seriousness and a sombre realisation that the party could be in government very shortly. Banished, for the most part, were the debates from previous conferences that pitched the coming years as a “battle for the soul of the Labour Party”. The leadership and direction of travel appears to have been settled. So what can charities learn from conference about influencing Labour ahead of the next election?

Values not numbers matter

The Labour Party is very much focused on policies which it believes reflect its values. The lesson from the last General Election that Labour has taken is that if it stays true to its core values of universalism, social justice and equality then it can win. Financial cost appears to be a secondary, though still important, issue. Scrapping Tuition fees, taking PFIs in house, ending welfare cuts and investing in public services are more confidently expressed. Although Labour is still keen to show that it is fiscally responsible (John McDonnell’s constant references of the election ‘Grey Book’ of costings are an example), the party isn’t put off by big numbers. There is also a belief that the Party can shrug off newspaper criticism. The message is that the Party has won enough of a hearing from the public that significant spending proposals will not be dismissed immediately because of the deficit. For charities, as with everything, there are risks and opportunities. On the plus side, many of Labour’s values such as social justice and equality, play right into the wheel arch of the sector. There are opportunities to build strong relationships with the party as senior figures appear keen to reach out to civil society. But on the minus side, there is as much concern with how services should be delivered as the quality of the services themselves. There is still a lingering suspicion that charities are privatisation by the back door and that the sector has been ‘co-opted’ into public service cuts. Charities will need to show that they are not self-interested but put their beneficiaries at the heart of everything they do.

Brexit has not been resolved in Labour

Looking ahead to the Conservative Party Conference, it is clear that Brexit is going to dominate. Brexit was a big theme at Labour’s conference too but in a quiet way, always bubbling under the surface of every debate. I attended fringes on both the Leave and Remain side, and it is clear that both sides see it as their job over the next few months to push their party into a harder, clearer stance. One academic said that Labour’s party policy on Brexit currently was a “wonder of triangulation” but it doesn’t seem likely that it can last. Most discussions focused on attacking the government’s position (as you’d expect) but not very much on what Labour would do differently. This comes back to my first reflection about values. Just like the Conservatives, Brexit cuts across the values of the Labour Party. Concern about the marketisation of the state and big business are juxtaposed with a desire for open borders and supporting jobs. Just like the government, Labour are desperate for information. Charities are likely to get a hearing on Brexit, but again, it is more than just the numbers. Politicians want to know what Brexit will do to wider society. The ‘softer’ impacts such as social cohesion and cross-border partnerships appear much more often in Labour’s thinking than in the Conservative Party. Young people are also a strong area of focus. This is not only because of Labour’s values but also an electoral calculation. Charities working in this space are likely to get a hearing from the Party.

Radical policies wanted

Finally, as with every opposition at this stage of the electoral cycle, there was a lack of policy substance in many debates. Apart from the big PFI announcement, the conference appeared quite policy light. A lot of what we said was just re-announcements of what was in the election manifesto – maybe that shouldn’t surprise us, but given the media attention, you’d expect a little bit more freshness. Certainly there was nothing charity specific, and the brightest moment for our sector was Tom Watson’s reference to the value of social enterprise on the conference floor (hat tip to Social Enterprise UK for their great work in raising awareness!). But the consistent message at all the fringes I attended was that Labour wanted to develop radical policies that were going to solve issues completely, not merely tinker at the edges. As one senior cabinet member said “people are sick to death of incrementalism”. The lesson from the election is that radical is popular. Charities far too often try to thread the needle when it comes to policy. Trying to work out what politicians want to hear, and then trying to fit what is in the needs of beneficiaries within this window, rather than saying what they really think. My feeling from conference is that charities can afford to be bolder with Labour than in the past. Will it solve the problem? How quickly can be in be done? And most importantly, is it the right thing to do? These are the questions Labour wants answered. The number crunching comes later. « Back to all blog posts

Blog

Serious but still lacking substance – Labour Party Conference 2017

Values not numbers matter

Brexit has not been resolved in Labour

Radical policies wanted

Related Content

Bespoke interventions for the sector are never more needed

Finance Focus September

Collapse in charity provision looms at moment of greatest need

Finance Focus August

Finance Focus July

Summer Economic Update

"Whack-a-mole" economic update

Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme update

From red to green, but what does it mean for us?

Restarting the economy amidst coronavirus

Natwest support to the charity sector

What does the chancellor’s announcement mean for charities?

COVID-19: General guidance and short-term action planning

COVID-19 – what planning should charities be undertaking?

What should charities expect from the budget?

Caron Bradshaw appointed as a member of new SORP Committee

Sector bodies issue joint proposal for Chancellor ahead of March's Budget

Key messages from the Bank of England’s January Monetary Policy Report

Learn, earn and change the world: Social Change Degree Apprenticeship opens for second round of employer partners

Takeaways from the Migration Advisory Committee report

Economic Outlook Briefing December 2019

Finance Focus Nov/Dec 2019

A Charity Finance Manifesto To Enable Civil Society To Thrive

Has the Charity Commission has taken the wrong tone in its election guidance

Why does the narrative around public 'trust' makes me feel so uncomfortable?

What does Labour’s independent schools proposal mean for charities?

A living wage needs to lead to a sensible discussion about charity funding

Time to get on an election footing

Spending Review Briefing 2019

We must prepare for a no-deal Brexit

Five takeaways from August’s Inflation Report

The lessons for Oxfam and the wider sector

Our new PM is neither a buffoon nor a jester. It's time to take him seriously.

What does the new prime minster mean for the charity sector?

The Charity Tax Commission report - does it go far enough?

BEIS Review of the Financial Reporting Council

CFG Annual Handbook 2019

Economic Outlook Briefing 2019/20

Brexit crystal ball

Spring Statement 2019

If it comes down to a vote on no-deal, vote against it, says CFG

Charity Property Matters Survey 2018

CFG responds to the Charity Commission’s consultation on the SORP-making process

Charities are ill-prepared for a no-deal Brexit and fear the worst: CFG survey

Are you prepared for a WTO Brexit?

What the recent SCOTUS judge controversy can teach us about the Charities’ SORP

The Brexit deal is bad for charities says CFG, as it urges MPs to vote against it on Tuesday

London Charity Property Survey Findings

London Charity Property Survey Results in Summary

London Property Survey Statistical Analysis

Increasing number of charities fear property poses risks to their charitable mission

Charity Finance Group's briefing on the Autumn Budget 2018

Live Blog: Budget 2018

Labour Conference September 2018 update - Brexit and Beyond

Brexit will be bad for both charities and beneficiaries, says new report from CFG

Cost Benefit Analysis Of Brexit For Charities

Does the Civil Society Strategy deliver for charities?

Post-Brexit immigration rules could cause skills shortage in charities

The charity work force in post-Brexit Britain

Economic Outlook Briefing 2018

Charities need to find nearly £4bn additional income by 2020 finds CFG

CFG Annual Handbook 2018

Apprenticeship Levy Guide

Spring Statement 2018: What should charities be looking out for?

Review: Wolves in Sheep’s Clothing Report - Extremism in Charities

A stairway to heaven on business rates for the charity sector?

Live Blog: Autumn Budget 2017

What should charities expect from the Autumn Budget 2017?

Government no longer has the luxury of ignoring charities

Could political instability create financial instability for charities?

Local infrastructure needs more support if it is going to meet needs of small charities, finds CFG report

Why has CFG written a report on potential Brexit deals?

Charities could thrive with a ‘clean Brexit’ says major report

The government is in danger of ignoring social issues in Brexit talks